(June 17, 2012 at 11:01 am)Drich Wrote:(June 17, 2012 at 10:42 am)Tobie Wrote: What you posted was the claim. You have not supplied any evidence that this happens, much less proved it.
This "evidence" you say paul used is extremely dubious - for it to be admissible as evidence, it first has to be proved jesus existed, than that he resurrected and promised to resurrect the dead. Then, you'd have to show why these things mean that 1 Corinthians 15:42-49 is true. I doubt you'll get past the first of these premises.
How many times do we personally need to have this discussion?
Read the post by darwinian.
Maybe you should be clearer with your definition of proven. Clarify it by saying "proven within the context of my bullshit" or whatever.
Anyway, my point still stands what you posted is not evidence, it is the claim. Explain how paul used the resurrection of jesus etc. to prove what is said in 1 Corinthians:15:42-49 in the context of the bible.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
