RE: A very cool photo shoot involving abortion
June 19, 2012 at 5:42 pm
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2012 at 5:47 pm by Tempus.)
(June 19, 2012 at 2:49 pm)Shell B Wrote: Pornography is what is really prohibited.
It's rather odd when you think about how touchy we are about showing images of humans having sex. I understand there's reasons why this board - and many boards - prohibit pornography (and I'm not protesting it), but it's unfortunate I think. Are photos of animals having sex pornography or sexually explicit? Aren't humans animals? If our closest relatives (species-wise, that is) still lived would their sex be pornographic? How far back would we have to go before the answer changes? Perhaps the classification lies with the intent of the photographer and how it's photographed? Or maybe it's due to us not being attracted to other species? Yeah, this post has nothing to do with this thread.
(June 19, 2012 at 3:07 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Don't forget the barbeque sauce.
A six-pack of eggs cost less than an abortion if you're looking for a cheap meal.
