Science + Creation

[Zen Badger]

Thanks for linking me to that apophenia. I'll have a look at the 5 parts when I get the time.

I just watched the first 50 seconds of that one and I agree with what it's saying about the speed of light. The thing with the video my friend showed me is that their argument is that time wasn't constant in the beginning.

Because the simple explanation of why the universe is so old relies on the equation

time = distance/speed

it means that if time wasn't constant then that changes the outcome of the equation to a possibly wrong answer, just like if the speed of light wasn't always constant (which I think it always has). Either way I'll check out the 5 videos and see what their arguments are.

The long age big-bang idea has a problem of it's own with light-travel-time. Seems there are points in the distant universe which are today all the same temperature, yet they are so far apart that there has not been anywhere near enough time for energy travelling at the speed of light to cross that distance to equilibrate the temperature. Even with the billions of years the big-bang model shows, the big-bang model needs billions of more years than that. :Carl Wieland
So if the speed of light which is the speed limit of the universe is a problem with the big-bang, why do you allow for the big-bang and yet dismiss creation for the same reason.

You have absolutely no fucking idea what you're talking about, do you...

Imagine two kettles on opposite sides of the Earth. When they reach 100 deg they are going to be at the same temperature and they don't need to be in communication with each other to do that.

Do try to learn some real science instead of spouting the inane drivel that the cretinists vomit up.