RE: Rand Paul...Dumb as a Bag of Cunt Hair
July 1, 2012 at 10:43 am
(This post was last modified: July 1, 2012 at 10:58 am by Anomalocaris.)
(July 1, 2012 at 4:57 am)Stue Denim Wrote: I think Rand has a point, not on the healthcare law (I'm not cell versed enough on the topic to debate that), but on the supreme court and constitutionality. Has your supreme court not made terrible decisions that anyone with half a brain can see are unconstitutional? For example Schenck v. U.S in 1919.
He has no point. In our system the operational definition of what is "constitutional" with respect to legislation is effectively what supreme court says. There is no functional meaning to right or wrong in this case. Right or wrong are only the ineffectual quibble of pundits.
The fact that supreme court reverses itself is irrelevant. It is what the supreme sort says until the supreme court reverses itself, then it is what the supreme court will say after it reverses itself.
A constitution is literally worthless if there is no supreme arbiter of whether legislation is constitutional. Whether the supreme count is right is far less important than the fact that what supreme court says counts.
(July 1, 2012 at 6:27 am)jackman Wrote: cunt hair may be dumb but i still enjoy digging thru it.
That'd dumb. I like'em clean shaven.