Good debate, but Carrier let himself get dragged far off message in the latter half of the debate, and Licona was using aspects of the narrative which themselves require independent assessment as if they could simply be assumed because they weren't part of the central claim. Licona practically made off with the store right underneath Carrier's nose.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 28, 2025, 6:41 am
Thread Rating:
Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection
|
Good debate, but Carrier let himself get dragged far off message in the latter half of the debate, and Licona was using aspects of the narrative which themselves require independent assessment as if they could simply be assumed because they weren't part of the central claim. Licona practically made off with the store right underneath Carrier's nose. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection - by Tea Earl Grey Hot - June 21, 2012 at 12:45 am
RE: Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection - by Cato - June 21, 2012 at 2:52 am
RE: Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection - by Tea Earl Grey Hot - June 21, 2012 at 1:13 pm
RE: Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection - by Cato - June 21, 2012 at 3:35 pm
RE: Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection - by Angrboda - June 22, 2012 at 11:58 pm
RE: Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection - by Tea Earl Grey Hot - June 21, 2012 at 4:22 pm
RE: Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection - by padraic - June 23, 2012 at 8:36 pm
RE: Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection - by Angrboda - July 1, 2012 at 11:48 pm
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)