RE: Christians
September 6, 2009 at 9:33 am
(This post was last modified: September 6, 2009 at 9:35 am by Dotard.)
(September 6, 2009 at 8:05 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: So, a variant on the no true Scotsman fallacy then?
Kyu
That's what I read. Also the thinly veiled "you just don't understand" line of crap (I have good reason to be highly skeptical about the level of theological literacy found at this site).
"Theological Literacy" seems to have a biological component to it as it evolves over time and with the increasing knowledge of man.
Not all that long ago if you maintained the creation story in genesis was allegorical as was the flood story, and you did not believe all life was made in a poof of magic but evolved (thru God's plan) then that was considered 'bad theology'. Now, it is quite the opposite.
A long time ago if you maintained the earth was not the center of creation and at the center of the universe covered by a firment or a dome, then you were 'theologically illiterate'.
Bad theology or theological illiteracy can both be rightly defined as any theology that does not agree with your own and that of your particular religious group.
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM