RE: Are cats atheists?
July 21, 2012 at 1:13 pm
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2012 at 1:17 pm by Mystic.)
(July 21, 2012 at 11:10 am)Simon Moon Wrote: There is still a lot of debate that free-will exists. The latest neural science is showing that we don't have free-will, we only have the illusion of free-will.
You seem to be making the claim, with absolute certainty, that free-will exists, when in reality some of the best minds in science and philosophy are not so sure.
Therefore you believe no one is justified in believing in free-will? Or claiming to know we have it from personal experience?
What I'm getting from you, we aren't justified in believing any of the following:
Free-will.
Objective morals.
Past exists beyond yesterday.
Induction outside of mathematics.
Because none of these can be proven by other then means of properly basic knowledge?
Quote:Here it is again. If I disbelieve that there is insufficient evidence to support claim X, that does not mean I necessarily believe claim X is false.
I got your point, I'm saying should you not believe in free-will?
Because there is a debate about free-will, we should all become agnostics towards free-will existing?
