RE: Right to die
July 26, 2012 at 12:34 pm
(This post was last modified: July 26, 2012 at 12:34 pm by Reforged.)
(July 26, 2012 at 12:24 pm)Godschild Wrote:(July 26, 2012 at 11:58 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: "without the food there was no need to extend his or our suffering"
Translation; he died sooner than he naturally would of because he wasn't fed.
Thats cutting someones life short to prevent further suffering.
Thats euthanasia.
If you can't deal with that and want to continue with your dellusion then don't present it as evidence euthanasia shouldn't be legal because thats grossly hypocritical and I will call you out on it.
You are the most hateful arrogant person I've ever met, all you care about is causing controversy, you are senseless in your understanding, your life must be a nightmare and in the future you will suffer from your way of life.
I'm not the one who refuses to acknowledge the one act of mercy he has ever admitted to doing. You cut his suffering short because it was the right thing to do. Thats the definition of euthanasia and it is not something that should be illegal or have any kind of shame or guilt cast on it.
Its the last merciful act of a loving individual to his dying relative.
I do not apologize for expressing that, if that makes me arrogant or hateful then who am I to argue.
I am however sorry for your loss.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.