(July 27, 2012 at 1:41 pm)Annik Wrote: I recently had a conversation that filled my head with fuck.
EDIT: This is an existential topic.
We have to have money to survive in this world. There is no getting around it. We need money for food, housing, clothing, and everything else under the sun. To get that money, we often have to do things we don't want to or wouldn't do otherwise. This holds especially true in the current economy. As an example, let's say you're trying to go through school. It's likely that you'll need to take up a job, maybe even two. Instead of going to college just to focus on your studies as you might want, you have to work to feed yourself. Having a job (and furthermore, not being able to choose a job you really want to work at due to slim pickings or lack of experience) is not exactly authentically you, but is a necessity.
Which brings me to the topic I'd like to discuss. Is it even possible to act in good faith while in such a system? How can one be authentic when we have to worry about survival? Does it really count as being authentic if you're trying to be as true to yourself as possible?
As a side discussion: How could this change? Would something like the Venus Project really work?
I think the term "being authentic" is being used rather loosely here. You say that being authentic means staying true to your motives and desires, but which motives and desires are you referring to here? Am I being authentic if I give in to the momentary desire to watch TV or am I being authentic if I keep in mind my motive of acing the class and devote my time to studies instead? Or am I not being authentic in either case, since I am going against atleast one of my desires. In that case, being authentic would simply be impossible for anyone, irrespective of the question of survival, since we do not live in a fantasy world where all our desires are fulfilled.
My view here is that for someone to have the capacity of being authentic, he must have a well-defined value structure. He must have his priorities - the importance he places on different motives and desires - in order. If he consistently chooses what's more important over the less, then he is being authentic. If he does not have such a structure, there would be no way to determine if he is being authentic or not.
Further on this structure, one can easily determine that survival would be near the top. In which case, you could say that when the question came to survival through a shitty job and starvation through a happy one and he chose survival, then he is acting authentically - but is he really? Acting authentically does not mean doing so only when the stakes are this big - it'd be a full time job. A series of small, but consistent "unauthentic" actions - those of choosing play over work - maybe the ones catching up to him. The reason your authenticity comes at a high price now maybe because of your un-authenticity in the past. So, is being consistently authentic possible - irrespective of whether it is a question of survival or not - yes. But the degree of self-awareness and introspection it'd require would be monumental.
