(July 30, 2012 at 7:05 pm)catfish Wrote:(July 21, 2012 at 8:31 am)genkaus Wrote: What you fail to completely understand is that neither the German scientist's book nor the transcript have ever been claimed to be infallible. Your bible does. Which means both that nobody lied and everything was transcribed correctly.
Bolded for emphasis (mine).
These are your words, not mine. You made the claim that the Bible claimed to be infallible. Care to deny your own words?
Why, yes, I do. Read the whole statement completely instead of taking a part of it out of the context. I said "neither the German scientist's book nor the transcript have ever been claimed to be infallible", not "neither the German scientist's book nor the transcript have ever claimed to be infallible". The distinction being that the claim of infallibility in the latter case is in the text itself. In the same vein, I mistakenly said "your bible does", when I should have said "your bible has". As far as I can tell, you have been harping on a grammatical mistake I made posts ago - a mistake which has not been repeated on my part. I can only assume that this is a deflection on your part from the main argument - you know, the one where you claim that the bible is infallible because it admits its faults.
