(July 31, 2012 at 3:03 pm)catfish Wrote: You sir, are most definetly a moron and a liar.
I wanted one person to support the "infallible" theory and you are the only one who did with your post(s) that you subsequently denied.
I said, and I quote my own words: "To me, infallible as a literal interpretation is impossible, yet infallible as a test booklet is quite plausible."
You fell for the trap, you made the claim that the bible makes the claim of infallibility, and then pussied out with lies and deflections.
Fuck off, you're dismissed...
You do understand what "implicit" means, don't you, you uneducated baboon?
Anyone who has read my posts (an ounce of brain being a prerequisite) would know that I consider the bible to be wrong on multiple accounts - much less infallible.
I made the mistake of implying that the said infallibility was indicated in the bible itself once - a mistake that was subsequently admitted and corrected - and yet, like a retarded chimpanzee, that is all you can focus on.
And so far, your own statement that the bible may be "infallible as a test booklet" has gone undefended. Can you even defend the statement or do you simply intend to continue deflecting - you retarded fucktard?
