RE: Evolution/creation 2
August 7, 2012 at 5:33 pm
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2012 at 5:38 pm by Drich.)
(August 7, 2012 at 5:25 pm)Faith No More Wrote:what have I added is what i am asking. the fact is i took away the artifical time line the 'church' put in place 1500 years ago. Leaving us with an undisclosed amount of time between creation and the fall. to which i simply suggested that the whole evolutionary mess could still neatly fit between these to biblical events and NOT Change a single word of the bible.Drich Wrote:Please by all means give me an example where i have stated the bible says________ or does not say________...
Not sure what you're asking, but what I was referring to in that post was that you have repeatedly said, "stay silent where the bible is silent." The bible is silent on the existence of these 'monkey men,' but realizing that the creation account in genesis doesn't fit with the known scientific evidence, you have attempted to add something where the bible is silent. So, which is it? Stay silent or add when the bible is obviously lacking?
I silenced the church's traditional (not biblical) time line. the rest i left up to the imaginations of the evolutionist and combined with biblical truth..
So again show me where i added anything. please...
(August 7, 2012 at 5:30 pm)Annik Wrote: Educate yourself.

like using wiki definations over Merrium-webster's definations, because the better suit my arguement? you mean change my world to reflect my reality, rather than adjusting my reality to fit the established standard?
Yeah, i'll be sure to hop on that turnip truck wid ja, why don't yu run on up thar, and I'll be along shortly...