(August 8, 2012 at 7:23 am)Faith No More Wrote:Drich Wrote:That's not me, that evolution. i am showing you how 'evolution could potentially fit with in the bounds of creation.
No, that's you inserting evolution into the bible where the bible says nothing about it. "Stay silent where the bible is silent," remember?
Do you realize the precedent you're setting with this mishmash of science and myth? When the bible doesn't conform to the scientific evidence, feel free to add to it to make it fit. What's stopping others from adding to other parts of the narrative where it doesn't fit the scientific episode, and more specfically, why can't I conform the ressurection to fit scientifc evidence by giving it a plausible, natural explanation?
Again the theology stops @ the fact there is not a time line between creation and the fall. as far as introducing 'evolution' into the mix i have only said this is just plausiable now (where it was not before) like a 100 times now.
That means I spoke where the bible spoke and remained silent where the bible was silent
