(August 9, 2012 at 10:12 am)FallentoReason Wrote: Saying something is plausible when the Bible doesn't say otherwise isn't exactly staying silent..Staying silent is Not interjecting doctrine into the bible, and forcing believers to adhear to said doctrine as if the bible records it. Observing or pointing out the silence of the bible (by removing the time line) and then identifying a plausiable outcome like this one, is not interjecting doctrine where the Bible has none. For everyone could simply ignore or accept what they hear. Theories on the other hand demand to be accepted or rejected.
That is why this is not a theory. It is a biblicaly based removal of a traditional time line placed on the life of Adam and Eve. Which give oppertunity for the creation account to assimilate anything that happened outside of the garden.
