RE: Evolution/creation 2
August 9, 2012 at 11:11 am
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2012 at 11:17 am by Reforged.)
(August 9, 2012 at 9:28 am)Drich Wrote:(August 8, 2012 at 7:23 am)Faith No More Wrote: No, that's you inserting evolution into the bible where the bible says nothing about it. "Stay silent where the bible is silent," remember?
Do you realize the precedent you're setting with this mishmash of science and myth? When the bible doesn't conform to the scientific evidence, feel free to add to it to make it fit. What's stopping others from adding to other parts of the narrative where it doesn't fit the scientific episode, and more specfically, why can't I conform the ressurection to fit scientifc evidence by giving it a plausible, natural explanation?
Again the theology stops @ the fact there is not a time line between creation and the fall. as far as introducing 'evolution' into the mix i have only said this is just plausiable now (where it was not before) like a 100 times now.
That means I spoke where the bible spoke and remained silent where the bible was silent
It would be plausible if creationism had any evidence behind it and didn't claim an invisible, all-powerful being made the universe appear without breaking a sweat then decided he would have to make Adam out of dust as opposed to making him simply appear.
Then decided to break off Adams rib and make Eve out of it.
According to Creationism these were the first human beings.
Oh and then a snake talked to Eve to convince her to eat an apple.
At which point God was pretty pissed off they'd eaten "The Fruit of Forbidden Knowledge". Not particularly sure why he put it out for them. He knows everything after all, he must of known this would happen but thats another dicussion.
Anyway, they got cast down to earth as a result.
Thats the creationists theory.
There is no proof behind it and it sounds like something a child would come up with.
Unless you can prove it you have no cause to assume its true and definitely no cause to attempt to mix it with far more plausible theories.
Theres no reason the story of Apocalypse Now! couldn't of taken place during the Vietnam War... except someone took it from the experiences of a man called Conrad and theres no evidence any such events ever took place during that time frame or even in that country.
The Vietnam War did though, we can prove it did... just incase anyones wondering.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.