Evolution/creation 2

[Drich]

Oh I see how it works. All this time I thought it was the content of my posts using logic, reason and evidence that mattered. I feel so silly now you've shown me what makes a truly strong argument.

I win, I have the most laughter in my retort thereby making it the most plausible.
If you don't agree its because you can't fathom the eloquence of my point. :-)
-Drake

What made you post disagreeable and so funny is how convinced you were that it was right, but completely ignored the fact that you had to mislable my position and misidentify intentions, so you could move to dismiss. How can you change the topic so much and still claim to be discussing the same thing?

---

So, what do we have Drich? We have your insistence that a man named Moses wrote the first five books of the bible (up to and including writing about his own death and events thereafter).....or...we have the opinion of seminary textbooks, rigorous scholarship, and (my favorite) functioning minds.

Sorry, don't think I can side with you on this one, if you were the kind person who prided themselves on their vast wealth of biblical knowledge this particular claim would be almost inexcusable. It's a fundy joke, definitely not the kind of thing one would expect from an expert.

so, your 'feelings' and 'logic' against 1000's of years of Jewish tradition and History?
Sorry, don't think I can side with you on this one, if you were the kind person who prided themselves on their vast wealth of biblical knowledge this particular claim would be almost inexcusable. It's a fundy joke, definitely not the kind of thing one would expect from an expert.