I wonder.
The author of this is clearly in it for the shock value. Part of the reason you shock someone with your opinion is to change their minds, but when you frame your argument in terms that completely invalidate the other person's right to respond to you, you're doing that because you want to antagonize them and display their opinions with greater visibility and negativity. So, by her own criteria, she supports rape.
The author of this is clearly in it for the shock value. Part of the reason you shock someone with your opinion is to change their minds, but when you frame your argument in terms that completely invalidate the other person's right to respond to you, you're doing that because you want to antagonize them and display their opinions with greater visibility and negativity. So, by her own criteria, she supports rape.
