Now you've done it.
Any moment now one of the dickheads will start blabbering about all the "eye-witnesses" in their fucking bible.
Get out your umbrellas, boys. Shitstorm coming.
WHOOOOPEEEE
THe bible is a group of religious myths and legends - and HAS no provable basis in fact. While there are real places and things in the bible - the fact that there is a Kansas in no way proves that the Wizard of OZ is a real person - or even that Glinda is a good witch.
Sorry - but there is NO proof that any of the bible was written by anyone who could have been an eye witness to the christ - any more than we have proof that a person could be witness to Harry Potter killing Voldemort.
People who make that argument have NOTHING to support their statements - since we have NO proof of authorship of most of the bible.
Textual criticism has established - for instance that the book of John was clearly written by THREE different people - and they are not named
Any moment now one of the dickheads will start blabbering about all the "eye-witnesses" in their fucking bible.
Get out your umbrellas, boys. Shitstorm coming.
WHOOOOPEEEE
THe bible is a group of religious myths and legends - and HAS no provable basis in fact. While there are real places and things in the bible - the fact that there is a Kansas in no way proves that the Wizard of OZ is a real person - or even that Glinda is a good witch.
Sorry - but there is NO proof that any of the bible was written by anyone who could have been an eye witness to the christ - any more than we have proof that a person could be witness to Harry Potter killing Voldemort.
People who make that argument have NOTHING to support their statements - since we have NO proof of authorship of most of the bible.
Textual criticism has established - for instance that the book of John was clearly written by THREE different people - and they are not named
