RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
August 25, 2012 at 7:34 pm
(This post was last modified: August 25, 2012 at 7:35 pm by Tea Earl Grey Hot.)
(August 25, 2012 at 7:25 pm)Stimbo Wrote: It's rather like Conservapedia's infamous posterboy NephilimFree, when he says he's "studied" geological evidence and scientific papers. What he really means, and he's actually admitted this, is that he just looks at photos and, at best, glances at the titles and the abstracts of scientific papers. That apparently counts as study for these people.
Well, maybe part of the problem might be that journals are so hard to be accessed for lay people. Articles are expensive (if they're even for sale). I have the luxury right now since I'm in college of having access to JSTOR, Oxford Journals, and a ton of our databases for free so I'm collecting all the articles I can find while I have the opportunity on whatever specific topic that interests me so I can study it later.
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
