(August 28, 2012 at 10:04 am)A Theist Wrote: No. My question's the one that's relevant. Not yours. Bush is not the president. Barack Obama is.
Which economy would you prefer? The one we have right now or the one Obama promised we'd have by now, (by the end of his 'first' term)?
I'd prefer the ideal economy to the one we have now. Obama has been a disappointment. I fully concede that and always have. But Obama isn't running against my fantasy president. He's running against Romney. Romney's economic plan is Bush Part II.
Ergo, my question is relevant. Do you really want four more years of W Bush via Romney? Would you trade the economy we have now for the one we had at the end of Republican deregulation and trickle down?
Yes or no?
ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!!!
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
