I feel like there's a double standard happening here. Why do we all agree that tangible evidence for a god (e.g. personal revelation) voids free will? We speak of free will in that instance as if there actually is free will, but then on this thread you all seem to agree that free will doesn't exist anyways..? I'm so confused.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle