RE: The 'Faithful'
September 3, 2012 at 11:28 pm
(This post was last modified: September 3, 2012 at 11:34 pm by Ryantology.)
When I've asked you to answer questions for me which you have answered for others, you got all bitchy about it.
It's pretty obvious what OP is getting at. It isn't enough to believe that God acted in mysterious ways as God should be capable of doing. He had to be made flesh in the form of Jesus so that he could die on the cross to save mankind from their skepticism and enjoyment of sex. This demands that he is human and introduces the demand for physical proof he existed.
If this doesn't happen, then the entire basis for Christianity as we know it is null and irrelevant.
It's pretty obvious what OP is getting at. It isn't enough to believe that God acted in mysterious ways as God should be capable of doing. He had to be made flesh in the form of Jesus so that he could die on the cross to save mankind from their skepticism and enjoyment of sex. This demands that he is human and introduces the demand for physical proof he existed.
If this doesn't happen, then the entire basis for Christianity as we know it is null and irrelevant.
