(September 3, 2012 at 11:28 pm)Ryantology Wrote: When I've asked you to answer questions for me which you have answered for others, you got all bitchy about it.
It's pretty obvious what OP is getting at. It isn't enough to believe that God acted in mysterious ways as God should be capable of doing. He had to be made flesh in the form of Jesus so that he could die on the cross to save mankind from their skepticism and enjoyment of sex. This demands that he is human and introduces the demand for physical proof he existed.
If this doesn't happen, then the entire basis for Christianity as we know it is null and irrelevant.
And it should not be too difficult to understand what it is I am saying either.
If you take away the record of any man who lived in that time, what 'proof' would their be for anyone?
For instance If you take away all that was written about Piolet or even Ceasar, then what proof would remain about any of these men?
EVERYTHING Hings on what History records. Even events or records of men who lived just a few hundred years ago like Washington. Meaning if you take away all that is written about a man then of course you can call into doubt the existance of a given indivisual...
