RE: Op/ED g/God, broken concept
September 5, 2012 at 6:19 am
(This post was last modified: September 5, 2012 at 6:34 am by Brian37.)
(September 4, 2012 at 11:17 pm)Lion IRC Wrote:(September 4, 2012 at 9:36 pm)Brian37 Wrote: ...If the first people who postulated an invisible friend were right, then why are you not worshiping their god?
I am worshipping their God.
Why are you pushing me. I agree with your premise about the first people.
(September 4, 2012 at 9:36 pm)Brian37 Wrote: ...And what the fuck does this have to do with abortion? Is this your pathetic way of making pro choice people look like Hitler?
I made it pretty clear that science was helping my biblical view about the sanctity of life and I dont recall mentioning the Nazis.
Did I hit a raw nerve?
I know what it's called when I am the first person to mention Hitler - Godwins Law. But whats it called when someone else (falsely) verbals you as having dragged Mr Hitler into the discussion.
(September 4, 2012 at 9:36 pm)Brian37 Wrote: ...A SPERM IS A POTENTIAL LIFE so every time you masturbate you are committing mass genocide.
Really? Hmmm. Thats an interesting idea you have.
(September 4, 2012 at 9:36 pm)Brian37 Wrote: ...then Angelina Jolie is sucking....[redacted]
Gutsy move naming an "A list" celebrity in that particular way.
I recommend against it, just to be safe, because they have big bank accounts and good lawyers and their professional reputation
is VERY VALUABLE/EXPENSIVE.
Yea, Angelina spends her days reading my posts. I wish
FYI People vs Larry Flint. It is called parody which is perfectly protected by the Supreme Court.
Quote:I know what it's called when I am the first person to mention Hitler - Godwins Law.
"I'm Wolf Blitzer in the Situation Room, our top story tonight DUH!"
Good for you, do you want daddy to put your finger painting on the fridge with a gold star? So what's with the pictures then? Is that supposed to embarrass us or shame us?