(September 6, 2012 at 3:54 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Hopefully I am making it clear that I advocate a moderate pro-life position, in which the rights of fully developed humans and the unborn are weighted against each other. I do not assume, like pro-choice believers, that the unborn have no rights at all. Nor do I believe they should be afforded the complete rights of a healthy competent adult. Age, viability and the circumstances surrounding the pregnancy matter. But I do believe that the unborn have some measure of human rights however minimal.
A fully developed human has the right to live. Those that can be considered to be not "fully" developed - such as newly borns, the retarded, the terminally ill or those in vegetative state - also have the right to live. The unborn do not have that right. How exactly did you find a middle ground between life and death?
