OOH this is an interesting argument.
Ill deal with them as follows.
1) the accidental capture of a rape on screen is nonsense. We have lalrady gotten accidental CCTV captures of such things and no one has been prosecuted.
2) Its true that no one is prosecuted for watching a murder however if someone did murder for the purpose of selling such videos then the law would probably have to change. Actually there si no evidence for real snuff movies.
3) The production of child pornography and the purchase or distribution of such images should still be a criminal offence as should the production and distribution of pictures of animal cruelty
4) I don;t think that mere pictures of naked children should illegal even if used for sexual gratification.
Ill deal with them as follows.
1) the accidental capture of a rape on screen is nonsense. We have lalrady gotten accidental CCTV captures of such things and no one has been prosecuted.
2) Its true that no one is prosecuted for watching a murder however if someone did murder for the purpose of selling such videos then the law would probably have to change. Actually there si no evidence for real snuff movies.
3) The production of child pornography and the purchase or distribution of such images should still be a criminal offence as should the production and distribution of pictures of animal cruelty
4) I don;t think that mere pictures of naked children should illegal even if used for sexual gratification.
