(September 17, 2012 at 9:19 pm)Cinjin Wrote: Arguing with the brothers-in-christ about the morality of god is so completely pointless.
Their god has to adhere to no rules. His actions are always just & righteous simply because he declares them to be. His morality cannot be defined by a human and therefore any working definition of any word to describe his actions can be changed at any time to suit him.
The known definitions of words like justice, fairness, love, unconditional, righteous, and even omnipotent are meaningless as they cannot be applied to an almighty deity. If god kills and maims than it is just and moral regardless if it clearly is not. The arrogance and stupidy of a christard will not allow you to debate this topic. "God wins every time ... thus saith the sheep."
An attempt to clarify what I mean:
This is a hammer. Worldwide, by all definitions, this is a hammer.
Christard: God does not have to adhere to a human's definition of a hammer, and god has already said that this is a spoon.
A lowly insignificant human does not tell god what a spoon is!
Replace the words hammer and spoon with any of the words aforementioned and you'll see why arguing this topic is an exercise in futility.
Hey, I love Cinjin's "Christard". I think I can now distinguish myself from the other Christians. OK, this is my definition: A Christard is someone who calls himself a Christian but he believes in all the fables of the religion: God, unicorn, angels, the resurrection, virgin birth, demons, heaven and hell, etc.
A Christian, on the other hand, is one who follows the Christian tradition but he is too mature to believe in fables and supernatural nonsense.
I'm a Christian. Drich is CHRISTARD. Ho Ho Ho!!! This is so cool.