To the Moderators, please!

[Reforged]

Right, just to close the case on this bullshit merchant;
- Godschild told me he apparently didn't even agree to the debate with Grene in the first place and I'm fully inclined to trust him on this one. Despite this Grene saw fit to make a thread on the subject of an upcoming debate with Godschild.

I can not believe you are going through with this, as you said he is just looking for attention, I have said the same thing about him. This little child is taking over things and no one seems to see this but you. He never asked me to debate him on scriptural truths, he announced it as if I had accepted that premise. The only thing I ever agreed to is this, he claimed he could prove he was a christian through scripture and I took up that challenge, gave 'genekaus one verse that would end it all, yet some seem to think beating a dead horse will change my mind, it want, the whole idea of debating a 13 year old child who has no idea what life contains is ridiculous.

Thanks for confirming what I was saying in the thread,
Godschild

- After all the hype Grene made about the debate I actually agreed to, he then forwarded this message he had sent to Tiberius. Also enclosed is my response to Grene in protest to this. I scanned through it and didn't immediatly realize he had just forwarded me a message as opposed to... you know. Actually consulting me first.

Hi Tiberius,

My whole purpose of joining this forum (as well as Christian Forums) was to engage in a debate with Christians. I did get going somewhat in Christian Forums before they banned me (for being a non-Christian - they have strict rules on what constitutes a Christian and only a Christian can participate in debates). For a while, I thought godschild and Lion would be prepared to have a debate with me in AF but they both pulled out before we could even begin.

It is very difficult to get Christians who truly believe in the Bible to agree on a debate. I have tried this in many different places on the internet (and may I add, under many guises) but without any success.

I'm now left with a debate with an atheist (RaphielDrake). I have thought about it and really, there is not much to debate on. My real intention is to have a debate with a Christian, not an atheist. It wouldn't serve my purpose to lock horns with an atheist on a subject that is actually nothing more than a difference in definition. Only a debate with a Christian can truly be substantive, meaningful and interesting.

I think it is for the best if we abort this debate. I'm sorry if I have taken up your time for nothing. I apologise to RaphielDrake too. He may take it that I have capitulated because, really, there is not much that I can go on about.

Cheers,

greneknight

I disagree, I think theres alot to debate on and would still like to go through with it if possible.

So, just to recap:
- He asked Godschild to debate, who declined. The closest he comes to accepting is stating hypotheticals as to what would happen if he accepted.
- Grene then proceeded to create a thread announcing the debate to be happening regardless knowing that at the very least he could
lead a clusterfuck on Godschild. This is a thread in which he boasts and boasts and boasts.
- Godschild shows bafflement at this and for good reason. http://atheistforums.org/thread-14793-page-6.html
- Grene proceeds to announce Godschild is retreating, seeing this as a good opportunity for rep whoring despite the fact that Godschild rightly states he cannot be seen as retreating if he did not agree to formally debate in the first place.
- Cue RaphielDrake who has a low tolerance for bullshit ingeneral http://atheistforums.org/thread-14793-page-8.html
- A fanfare of intense masturbation emerges from Grenes posts ultimately ending in a disappointing and uncharacteristically quiet retreat.

Reason? Grene wants easy targets to gain approval. He'll bully those he knows don't hold popular views without ever putting his own in the firing line. Not a crime in itself but when you consider the arrogant, dishonest and shameless fashion this has been done in its hard to imagine anyone employing this kind of Fox News approach to debate having a single shred of self-respect left.
I want it known I would not have posted this if not for the unacceptable way Godschild was treated. You don't do a dishonest smear campaign regardless of who you're targeting.
And with that I condemn this thread back to the rectal haemorrhage it was birthed from. Bye. :-)