(September 20, 2012 at 7:28 pm)genkaus Wrote:(September 20, 2012 at 6:47 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Well TBH, if this universe was the only universe to exist, I would say teleological argument is good evidence, although not conclusive evidence of a designer.
However, a designer is not the only explanation, multiple universes can be an explanation.
But then I have questions....like why would it vary from universe to universe?
Also, if we come across so many life in the future in the universe, sentient life forms, while we know it is very much against the odds....wouldn't it seem like a designer wanted there to be sentient life.
I am not making an argument either way. I'm just saying dismissing "evidence" of design simply because it can be chance doesn't seem logical to me.
I say evidence not in the sense it's conclusive, but that strongly favors the notion.
Even if this were the only universe, no one said that the values came about by chance. You are assuming that those constants could have had any value all of which would've been equiprobable. But physics doesn't work like that. When you toss a coin in the air, mathematics might say that the chance of getting heads is 50-50, but in physics, we can actually determined at the throw that the chance of heads is 100% and of tails is 0 or vice-versa.
So it's by physical necessity?
