Good find. I began to browse the site, and immediately found one of my very favorite kinds of arguments:
"...Joseph Smith could not possibly have written the Book of Mormon. How could a young, farm boy with limited education like Joseph have written a fairly long, complex, flawless religious text like the Book of Mormon? If Joseph could not have written the book on his own, then therefore his story of the golden plates and the angel must be true."
If this specific alternative did not happen, then it MUST be true.
There are so many believers out there who spend all of their time & energy attempting finding ways to disprove what we do know about the creation of the earth in order to say "well if it's not this, it must be god!"
The disproof of one alternative is just that. It says absolutely nothing about what actually happened.
"...Joseph Smith could not possibly have written the Book of Mormon. How could a young, farm boy with limited education like Joseph have written a fairly long, complex, flawless religious text like the Book of Mormon? If Joseph could not have written the book on his own, then therefore his story of the golden plates and the angel must be true."
If this specific alternative did not happen, then it MUST be true.
There are so many believers out there who spend all of their time & energy attempting finding ways to disprove what we do know about the creation of the earth in order to say "well if it's not this, it must be god!"
The disproof of one alternative is just that. It says absolutely nothing about what actually happened.
