Well, this thread suffers from the same problem commonly referred to as the fallacy of the false analogy. If we analogize one thing to another, that because two things are alike according to one property, they are then of necessity alike in other properties. That man was like God does not indicate in which ways man is like God. Since the bible doesn't specify in what way man is like God, it's improper to include or exclude any specific property. (And throughout time, various attributes have been asserted as being bestowed in Eden this way, from free will to rationality to moral goodness.)
What may be of slightly more interest is that in Genesis 1:26, God created mankind in his image, but it's unclear whether that image had a sexual nature or not.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)