(October 2, 2012 at 6:16 pm)JohnDG Wrote:(October 2, 2012 at 6:10 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Well, your racial classifications are very "American-like" at best, and by that, I mean shallow and outdated. It's a well known fact that not even the Japanese, Chinese and Koreans are of the same race. Their facial characteristics and skull shapes, and even their bodily figures differ from eachother. The only likeness they have is that they have been under the sinic influence for too long.
Likewise, the "middle-eastern" classification is very faulty. Nearly all races in the middle east can be easily distinguished from eachother. Of course, due to geographic location, as you say, similarities between individuals of all of those can be found. But in general, I have no problems in distinguishing a persian from an arab, an arab from kurd, an armenian from a persian, and a turk from the rest.
If they were all o' the same race, they would have been the same people, wouldn't you agree?
Similarly, there are only five "pure" races in Europe. The Germanics, the real Germanics, who have subclassifications according to their external looks, Slavs, Celts, Albanians and Greeks. The rest are mongrels.
If they were all the same race they would probably be human. Oh wait they are, but your assumption that people are a different species based on their looks disgust me and is a disgrace to every human on this planet.
No, they would not. Dogs are all dogs. They are not all the same type of dog.
Besides, I do not deny that we're all of the same species. I just don't think that I have to bend over to them just because they are of the same species as I am.
I am of a different tribe, they are of a different tribe. I cherish in the differences between tribes, and cherish the similarities of my own tribe.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?