(October 14, 2012 at 1:08 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I repeat, I am not a slave to your book of superstitions as others may be. As a writer, I am always conscious of the need for clarity, out of basic respect for the reader. So I think we've reached the point where it's cards on the table time. If you have something to say, please say it. If not, go away.
It has nothing to do with you being a slave. You said "what makes you think I haven't read the bible?" So most people would assume that by your own statement you've read it. Is that a logical conclusion? Why do you equate reading a book with being a slave to it? Its funny how you say that you've read the bible then gripe that I wasent being clear about something that's in the book you say you've read but then when something goes by you then it's "I'm not a slave to your book of superstitions" which seems a creative way to say "I was talking out of my butt when I said I read your book of superstition". Ahhh,good so we've established you arent very knowledgable about the bible after all.
