RE: To the Moderators, please!
October 15, 2012 at 11:07 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2012 at 11:09 am by Darkstar.)
(October 15, 2012 at 9:03 am)Tnmusicman Wrote: It has nothing to do with you being a slave. You said "what makes you think I haven't read the bible?" So most people would assume that by your own statement you've read it. Is that a logical conclusion? Why do you equate reading a book with being a slave to it? Its funny how you say that you've read the bible then gripe that I wasent being clear about something that's in the book you say you've read but then when something goes by you then it's "I'm not a slave to your book of superstitions" which seems a creative way to say "I was talking out of my butt when I said I read your book of superstition". Ahhh,good so we've established you arent very knowledgable about the bible after all.
I think it's pretty clear that
1. he read it, and
2. he doesn't take everything/anything in it at face value on faith
I'd like to see someone defend the validity of the Noah's Ark story, as no one has succeeded in doing so. Either that or admit it's a metaphor.
Likewise, about the 'clarity'. There have been many different interpretations of the bible, and none have yet been proven to be the 'correct' one.
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
