(September 28, 2009 at 1:14 am)Arcanus Wrote: So then, "No proposition can be held as true unless it can be verifed either by empirical observations or logical tautology." Is that it?
(September 28, 2009 at 12:29 am)theVOID Wrote: Likewise, your TAG is nothing more than an assumption ...
Hardly. You can cast aspersions, if you like, on the extensive hours I have invested in presenting arguments back and forth with Adrian (which I know he, at least, recognizes and appreciates), but I think that probably says more about you than anything else.
The TAG only works if you presuppose the existence of God as the source of logical absolutes and morals and you have not once (correct me if i'm wrong) provided any evidence for the existence of God or any reason at all to believe that God is the only answer to these questions, so ultimately you have nothing more than a self-contained argument designed deliberately not to need external validation.
And the fact that you spend "extensive hours" chasing your tail just makes it more amusing.
.
