RE: An argument that disproves God possibly existing?
October 26, 2012 at 3:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2012 at 3:19 pm by Mystic.)
Heh, so it turns out the polytheists had the concepts that were rationally possible. Yet the monotheist seems to be the most rational.
heh. Maybe we have an absolute potential god within (generated by the mind) and that is the standard.
To be honest, the Aslem argument seems to be true to me still.
It seems without it, evolution just created these experiences and measurements to help us survive and thrive. But it's not really with a basis.
At that, it feels "morality" is less binding. The beauty and greatness we see in it, is all just a delusion.
Perhaps evolution created the intuition of God to justify the belief in greatness, beauty, praise.
I dunno, this all so confusing. Are the damn nihilist right? Is there is no objective praise, no objective good, no objective evil?
(October 26, 2012 at 2:57 pm)Darkstar Wrote: Sound familiar?
heh. Maybe we have an absolute potential god within (generated by the mind) and that is the standard.
To be honest, the Aslem argument seems to be true to me still.
It seems without it, evolution just created these experiences and measurements to help us survive and thrive. But it's not really with a basis.
At that, it feels "morality" is less binding. The beauty and greatness we see in it, is all just a delusion.
Perhaps evolution created the intuition of God to justify the belief in greatness, beauty, praise.
I dunno, this all so confusing. Are the damn nihilist right? Is there is no objective praise, no objective good, no objective evil?
