Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
Breaking down the "God sees argument"
October 23, 2016 at 12:45 pm
Ok there is a mess of a thread to deal with now. I will formulate the argument differently, and we will go one step at a time.
1. We either objectively exist or we don't objectively exist.
Let us not move on, before we understand what is meant.
What I mean by we of course is not hands or feet or body, but that experience we constantly call "I".
Let me know if any objects to this 1st premise.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
October 23, 2016 at 1:13 pm
I didn't say otherwise. I'm asking how it's an either/or. How is it even possible for us to not objectively exist?
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
October 23, 2016 at 1:14 pm
(This post was last modified: October 23, 2016 at 1:14 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
The premise should be "we objectively exist" as far as I'm concerned [emoji4]
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
October 23, 2016 at 1:24 pm
What is the difference between we "objectively exist" vs. "we exist" ? Why the embellishment?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 2292
Threads: 16
Joined: September 28, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
October 23, 2016 at 1:33 pm
(This post was last modified: October 23, 2016 at 1:36 pm by ApeNotKillApe.)
Third option: We probably exist.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Posts: 2292
Threads: 16
Joined: September 28, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
October 23, 2016 at 1:38 pm
In the quantum sense of probably.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.