RE: Do you support the legalisation of polyagmy and polyandry
October 27, 2012 at 5:27 pm
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2012 at 5:37 pm by Mystic.)
It's true people 5 women and 5 men can decide to live together and raise a family without marriage, but right now it's looked down upon by society. I want to keep it that way. I don't want it become normal. When you say "marriage" which is public recognition of this relationship should extend to that, it's bound to become accepted.
Personally I agree with Shiite Islam regarding marriage except for multiple marriages. I think "muta" contract allows youth to marry for a temporary period even when they are not financially stable, and then you have "committed" marriage. Muta however means if there is a child, the man is still responsible to provide for that child. A contract that is binding and both must keep true to it. I don't believe that it's simply about cheating on your partner, but breaking the contract, would be dishonesty and breaking the laws of society. This way, there is less likely to be cheating. And people don't take their cheating simply as hurting the person they are cheating upon, but being condemned by society and breaking the social contract with society.
I don't believe 5 men and 5 women should be allowed to have a family together. The laws of society should prevent it.
No I said they can raise a family. But what the hell is romance with 3 on 3 poly? It's one twisted sick form of romance that for some reason has an attractive sexual weirdness to it. But it's disgraceful.
Maybe the religious people saying gay marriage is a red line that might break the foundations of family have a strong hunch of where all this is possibly heading.
It may have nothing to do with gay marriage being wrong, but the argument of sexual freedom and no society should enforce anything in the bedroom type mentality, that might lead society to a disgraceful dishonorable culture.
Personally I agree with Shiite Islam regarding marriage except for multiple marriages. I think "muta" contract allows youth to marry for a temporary period even when they are not financially stable, and then you have "committed" marriage. Muta however means if there is a child, the man is still responsible to provide for that child. A contract that is binding and both must keep true to it. I don't believe that it's simply about cheating on your partner, but breaking the contract, would be dishonesty and breaking the laws of society. This way, there is less likely to be cheating. And people don't take their cheating simply as hurting the person they are cheating upon, but being condemned by society and breaking the social contract with society.
I don't believe 5 men and 5 women should be allowed to have a family together. The laws of society should prevent it.
(October 27, 2012 at 5:20 pm)TaraJo Wrote: Dude, reading your post leads me to believe that you think the 3-on-3 poly marriage would be just one big sex fest. The reality of relationships is there's a lot more to it than sex. I mean, I enjoy sex with my boyfriend, but if there wasn't something else there, we would have broken up a long time ago. If we didn't have something else between us, there's no way us living together would ever work out.
No I said they can raise a family. But what the hell is romance with 3 on 3 poly? It's one twisted sick form of romance that for some reason has an attractive sexual weirdness to it. But it's disgraceful.
Maybe the religious people saying gay marriage is a red line that might break the foundations of family have a strong hunch of where all this is possibly heading.
It may have nothing to do with gay marriage being wrong, but the argument of sexual freedom and no society should enforce anything in the bedroom type mentality, that might lead society to a disgraceful dishonorable culture.
