RE: Do to really believe a snake talked?!
November 8, 2012 at 6:14 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2012 at 6:21 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
As I said, the that has always existed but not the what. In the sense that the what changes. Essence is not the same as existence. I explained all that, address those other points I made perhaps, please.
Science tells us that what science has detected has a finite age. It obviously can't tell us anything that it hasn't detected or anything beyond its scope! And can it even measure infinity anyway?
The fact remains that it's total nonsense to claim that non-existence ever existed. You might as well be arguing for square circles. Since non-existence never existed, existence has always existed.
Science defines things different ways. The classic example is how the definition of "atom" changed completely to suit science's sound discoveries. The "nothingness" that science detects obviously isn't the same as pure non-existence because how can you possibly detect something that isn't there? For something to be detectable there has to be something to be detected!
Science is sound and valid but it redefines things and that should be recognized. You can't truly measure non-existence. Existence has always existed.
Science tells us that what science has detected has a finite age. It obviously can't tell us anything that it hasn't detected or anything beyond its scope! And can it even measure infinity anyway?
The fact remains that it's total nonsense to claim that non-existence ever existed. You might as well be arguing for square circles. Since non-existence never existed, existence has always existed.
Science defines things different ways. The classic example is how the definition of "atom" changed completely to suit science's sound discoveries. The "nothingness" that science detects obviously isn't the same as pure non-existence because how can you possibly detect something that isn't there? For something to be detectable there has to be something to be detected!
Science is sound and valid but it redefines things and that should be recognized. You can't truly measure non-existence. Existence has always existed.
