RE: The Great Flood
November 8, 2008 at 12:18 am
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2008 at 12:21 am by Edwardo Piet.)
I have read enough of the bible to know what its like. I know that its unscientific and therefore the claims it makes are invalid.
You haven't read the gospel of the FSM have you? Does that mean that - going by what you are saying to me - you can't dismiss it as highly improbable that God is a Flying Spaghetti Monster until you have read it all? Its unscientific like the bible. You should like it.
So basically you're using your own personal experience to judge scripture, is that what you're saying? You are using the argument from personal experience to interpret the argument from scripture? Is that correct?
Oh and of course as I have said, the burden of proof is on you, not me. And I don't think the 'evidence' you are giving is evidence of God's existence or the truth of the bible. Because its unscientific. And highly improbable.
What has science done? And what has the bible done? Think about it.
You haven't read the gospel of the FSM have you? Does that mean that - going by what you are saying to me - you can't dismiss it as highly improbable that God is a Flying Spaghetti Monster until you have read it all? Its unscientific like the bible. You should like it.
So basically you're using your own personal experience to judge scripture, is that what you're saying? You are using the argument from personal experience to interpret the argument from scripture? Is that correct?
Oh and of course as I have said, the burden of proof is on you, not me. And I don't think the 'evidence' you are giving is evidence of God's existence or the truth of the bible. Because its unscientific. And highly improbable.
What has science done? And what has the bible done? Think about it.
