The Great Flood

[Edwardo Piet]

I have no argument with the fact that you can assume the Bible is full of shit without knowing anything about it. My argument is that that would be nothing more than an assumption. You are the one making that assumption and so the burden of proof is on you. Not me. As of yet you have given not one shred of evidence, and how could you do so?

I told you, I don't need evidence. Because the burden of proof is on you. Because you have to prove the existence of God or the truth of the bible first. I don't have to disprove God/the truth of the bible. That's the burden of proof. And to simply tell me that I have to disprove the truth of the bible is a cop out. So the burden of proof is NOT on me. You're the one who has to give proof of the bible's truth if one of us does. I don't have to disprove it. Thats the burden of proof. And all evidence you have suggested so far I do not consider evidence. Just as you don't consider evidence of evolution evidence.