Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 18, 2025, 3:48 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A scientific reason to not believe?
#14
RE: A scientific reason to not believe?
google is your freind

Quote:Richard Dawkins criticized Aquinas' collection of arguments in his book The God Delusion. He asserts that the first three arguments are essentially cosmological arguments that rely upon an infinite regress to which God is unjustifiably immune. He summarizes the fourth argument:


The Argument from Degree. We notice that things in the world differ. There are degrees of, say, goodness or perfection. But we judge these degrees only by a comparison with a maximum. Humans can be both good and bad, so the maximum goodness cannot rest in us. Therefore there must be some other maximum to set the standard for perfection, and we call that maximum God.

That's an argument? You might as well say, people vary in smelliness but we can make the comparison only by reference to a perfect maximum of conceivable smelliness. Therefore there must exist a pre-eminently peerless stinker, and we call him God. Or substitute any dimension of comparison you like, and derive an equivalently fatuous conclusion.

—Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinque_viae

Quote:Some cosmologists and physicists argue that a challenge to the cosmological argument is the nature of time: "One finds that time just disappears from the Wheeler–DeWitt equation" (Carlo Rovelli). The Big Bang theory states that it is the point in which all dimensions came into existence, the start of both space and time. Then, the question "What was there before the Universe?" makes no sense; the concept of "before" becomes meaningless when considering a situation without time. This has been put forward by J. Richard Gott III, James E. Gunn, David N. Schramm, and Beatrice Tinsley, who said that asking what occurred before the Big Bang is like asking what is north of the North Pole. However, some cosmologists and physicists do attempt to investigate what could have occurred before the Big Bang, using such scenarios as the collision of membranes to give a cause for the Big Bang

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument
Reply



Messages In This Thread
A scientific reason to not believe? - by journeyinghowie - November 25, 2012 at 2:30 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - November 25, 2012 at 2:32 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by journeyinghowie - November 25, 2012 at 2:41 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - November 25, 2012 at 3:41 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by The realest - December 3, 2012 at 6:01 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - December 5, 2012 at 7:34 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by FallentoReason - December 4, 2012 at 9:27 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Waratah - November 25, 2012 at 2:33 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by cratehorus - November 25, 2012 at 2:36 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Annik - November 25, 2012 at 2:37 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Annik - November 25, 2012 at 2:48 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by journeyinghowie - November 25, 2012 at 3:07 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Norfolk And Chance - November 25, 2012 at 12:33 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Mister Agenda - November 27, 2012 at 4:10 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Annik - November 25, 2012 at 3:10 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by journeyinghowie - November 25, 2012 at 3:17 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Gilgamesh - November 25, 2012 at 3:58 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by genkaus - November 26, 2012 at 2:45 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Ryantology - November 25, 2012 at 3:16 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Annik - November 25, 2012 at 3:19 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by cratehorus - November 25, 2012 at 3:43 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Creed of Heresy - November 25, 2012 at 4:16 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Voltron - November 25, 2012 at 4:16 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by KichigaiNeko - November 25, 2012 at 5:15 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by downbeatplumb - November 25, 2012 at 5:37 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by KichigaiNeko - November 25, 2012 at 7:58 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Welsh cake - November 25, 2012 at 5:36 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Zen Badger - November 25, 2012 at 7:09 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by pocaracas - November 25, 2012 at 11:21 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Angrboda - November 26, 2012 at 3:26 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by pocaracas - November 26, 2012 at 5:46 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Napoléon - November 25, 2012 at 2:47 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by The Grand Nudger - November 25, 2012 at 3:53 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cato - November 25, 2012 at 5:21 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by KichigaiNeko - November 27, 2012 at 2:15 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - November 27, 2012 at 4:03 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Kirbmarc - November 27, 2012 at 4:27 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Vincenzo Vinny G. - November 28, 2012 at 12:24 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Gilgamesh - November 28, 2012 at 12:27 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by overlord fombax - November 28, 2012 at 4:04 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - November 28, 2012 at 3:52 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Vincenzo Vinny G. - November 30, 2012 at 12:49 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cato - November 30, 2012 at 12:55 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by ThomM - December 1, 2012 at 9:09 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Darkstar - December 4, 2012 at 5:48 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Jackalope - December 3, 2012 at 1:36 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Voltron - December 3, 2012 at 1:45 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cato - December 4, 2012 at 6:17 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Lion IRC - December 4, 2012 at 9:32 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 14707 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  It's Darwin Day tomorrow - logic and reason demands merriment! Duty 7 1168 February 13, 2022 at 10:21 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Why do you not believe in the concept of a God? johndoe122931 110 14877 June 19, 2021 at 12:21 pm
Last Post: Mermaid
  "Why is it reasonable to believe in prisons, but not in the hell?" FlatAssembler 124 14216 February 19, 2021 at 12:11 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  No reason justifies disbelief. Catharsis 468 69943 March 30, 2019 at 6:57 pm
Last Post: fredd bear
  Who do not atheists believe? Interaktive 12 3322 March 25, 2019 at 10:46 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Choosing to/not to Believe? Not Possible? JairCrawford 61 13220 July 1, 2018 at 11:16 pm
Last Post: EgoDeath
  What is your reason for being an atheist? dimitrios10 43 11614 June 6, 2018 at 10:47 am
Last Post: DodosAreDead
  Are there any scientific books or studies that explain what makes a person religious? WisdomOfTheTrees 13 3407 February 9, 2017 at 2:33 am
Last Post: Mirek-Polska
  Is atheism a scientific perspective? AAA 358 88070 January 27, 2017 at 7:49 pm
Last Post: brewer



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)