(November 25, 2012 at 4:23 pm)Ryantology Wrote:(November 25, 2012 at 3:34 am)catfish Wrote: You are going to disregard all other religions and say that the Bible is the only "evidence" of God?
Yes. Their 'evidence' is just as untrustworthy.
If you believe what you wrote, then why claim that the Bible is the only "evidence" of God?
(November 25, 2012 at 4:23 pm)Ryantology Wrote:(November 25, 2012 at 3:34 am)catfish Wrote: I decide what is legit based on my own beliefs and knowledge.
What do you 'know' that proves to you the existence of God?
I know what I know, I can't explain it and I'm not required to. You are supposed to make up your own mind. What I say makes no difference to you just as what you say makes no difference to me...
(November 25, 2012 at 4:23 pm)Ryantology Wrote:(November 25, 2012 at 3:34 am)catfish Wrote: But, I don't argue the point of "what is", I argue the point of "what isn't". "Eternal" condemnation is not in the Bible and no matter how you spin it, an ion does NOT mean eternal...
While we're arguing 'what isn't', how about God? Eternal condemnation may not be in the Bible, but God is nowhere in evidence in this world.
I don't believe that God is "what isn't", so what exactly do you want me to say to you?
You say eternal condemnation "may" not be in the Bible, but that just shows that you don't know...
Open your eyes, there is evidence everywhere, it's all in how you interpret it for yourself...
