Pro-porn, anti-porn or in between?

[Something completely different]

It seems quite stupid that you don't know the difference between sex and porn.

You seem to have no idea what the term "sexuality" means.

Masturbation is just as much part of that individuals sexuality as having sex with a partner.

If you see sexuality as only having sex with a partner - you are mentaly still locked in the 1950s and missed the 1960s.

As well it seems stupid that you call Americans puritans when it's the US porn industry that holds the lions share of the revenue and production worldwide compared to the EU. And even in the EU, the reliance on actresses is primarily exploiting east-European women.

I know that a big part of the European porn industry exploits east european women.

And what the fuck! has the lion share of the profit got to do with this argument?

I was talking about the puritan influence within the american sociaty!

You wont find such hysterical protest against the erotic industry and general sexual openes and education within europe, as there is within the US.

But guess what, I actualy personaly know a couple who film themselves during sex.
And there are loads of such couples out there.

And I didn`t call americans puritans. I stated that american sociatial norms are strongly influenced by puritanism.

Probably because west-European women are too prudish? But perhaps this was an innocent mistake.

????

In terms of the science, it's difficult. Because people who use porn excessively often self-report as if they are normal. Just like people who smoke self-report that their fitness is normal.

Can you actualy make a statement which makes eaven less sence?

"In terms of science"????? behavioral studies are conducted under a garantee of anonymity and hence almoust allways bring realistic results.

Do you have any idea how studies are conducted?

There is no measure of health to compare to, and it's embarrassing for these people to self-report dysfunctions in their lives. And then we have, as you noticed, the ideologues in the debate. The crazy activists.

You dont have a single scientific study which proves this behavior to be dysfunctional jet you still call it dysfunctional.

crazy activists?????

So it's difficult to find good science. Look for the citations in the following links:

You only posted one link to a scientific paper.

and what the fuck is "good science"???????????????

studies which deliver results that fit into your worldview?

http://www.ansa.it/web/notizie/rubriche/...60579.html

Agenzia Nazionale Stampa Associata does not publish scientific papers!
It is a newschannel! A strongly catholic influenced italian newschannel!
Do you understand the meaning of the word "scientific paper"?

http://yourbrainonporn.com/middleburry-c...lames-porn

A article by Saadiah Shmidt.

Who studied psycology and economics.

And is member of a feminist activist group.........................

The article starting with the assertion without any studies or facts to back things up ............. that porn causes erectile problems.
Actualy this only brings one to the conclusion that masturbation causes erectile problems - which is a claim long disproven to be a worthless fearmongering Kelloges christian piece of steaming shit!

I didn`t continue after this.

Dishonest in the beginning - I conclude the rest of it will be dishonest aswell

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16497122


Researchers are also saying that the field of non-drug addiction studies is fairly new, so it's challenging. But these claims are being made by academics and professionals.

Oh I never doughted that it makes addictive.

But you dont seem to understand that addictive behavior can apply towrds alot of things.

People can be addicted to all sorts of things.

And the study above.

The only actual scientific study you posted. Is not centered arrounf internet porn only but arround internet addiction in total.

Not shitty Americans, those people you hate so much.

Never claimed hate.

Build your strawman in some other garden and bang your shitstick of a worthless strawmanargument against something else!

American sociaty is under a very strong puritan influence - therefor very prude.

Jet again. Your arguments here are just as stupid as in the social darwinism thread - hence I again have to question your motivation.