(December 2, 2012 at 9:24 am)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: No. I figured you were misspelling latter. Anyway. All those definitions for "porne" are for female prostitution.Exactly, because male prostitution wasn't anywhere near as common - just like it isn't today. Why would you reference male prostitutes specifically? That's what doesn't make sense about the argument that the reading is "male prostitute" rather than homosexual. That's what most scholars conclude when confronted with that text.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 21, 2024, 11:38 pm
Thread Rating:
Pro-porn, anti-porn or in between?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)