RE: Pro-porn, anti-porn or in between?
December 3, 2012 at 9:45 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2012 at 9:46 pm by Something completely different.)
Well Vincent finaly gave some scientific sources.
This study researches the effect pornography has within releations, to conclude that men are more likely to sexualy abuse their partners within a releationship when watchin porn combined with alcohol.
http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/When_No..._Women.pdf
The study doesn`t show if ther are negative effects on the consumers health.
This study observes the penile response of men after watching porn for two weeks:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...9477801639
Therefor it is not conclusive enought to draw conclusions on what long time effects are given for the conumers health.
In total, you failed jet again to give conclusive studies proving your point!
And after you stated that:
I dont buy this shit of yours:
And this statement here:
Is nothing but a dishonest rethorical attempt to divert attention from the fact that you cant provide conclusive evidence by stating your oponents are:
And thereby dishonestly attempting to disqualify them!
Let me tell you something. I usualy dont make arguments on privat expiriences, and tend to ignore arguments based on such.
But I suspect that you will continue, for lack of argument to brandmark every single opponent of yours as a:
Eaven if i was a porn addict, (and yes I believe it has addictive potential) it would not disqualify me from challengeing your possition!
And I think, due to your neurotic apperance and idiotic and babaric views, especialy on social darwinism.
That I probably have a far better sexlife than you ever had.
This study researches the effect pornography has within releations, to conclude that men are more likely to sexualy abuse their partners within a releationship when watchin porn combined with alcohol.
http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/When_No..._Women.pdf
The study doesn`t show if ther are negative effects on the consumers health.
This study observes the penile response of men after watching porn for two weeks:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...9477801639
Therefor it is not conclusive enought to draw conclusions on what long time effects are given for the conumers health.
In total, you failed jet again to give conclusive studies proving your point!
And after you stated that:
(November 30, 2012 at 11:04 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: I think your problem is you are a porn addict and you don't want to acknowledge its ill effects. No problem. It's actually better you spill your genes into a tissue rather than make someone pregnant and ruin the future for us.
I dont buy this shit of yours:
Quote:For those who still don't understand my position: I don't think porn itself is bad.
And this statement here:
Quote:Lonely porn-lovers are often very emotional in defending porn and trying to find faults, even incorrectly, in the claims being made.
Is nothing but a dishonest rethorical attempt to divert attention from the fact that you cant provide conclusive evidence by stating your oponents are:
Quote:Lonely porn-lovers
And thereby dishonestly attempting to disqualify them!
Let me tell you something. I usualy dont make arguments on privat expiriences, and tend to ignore arguments based on such.
But I suspect that you will continue, for lack of argument to brandmark every single opponent of yours as a:
Quote:Lonely porn-lover
Eaven if i was a porn addict, (and yes I believe it has addictive potential) it would not disqualify me from challengeing your possition!
And I think, due to your neurotic apperance and idiotic and babaric views, especialy on social darwinism.
That I probably have a far better sexlife than you ever had.