Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 4, 2025, 10:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A scientific reason to not believe?
#58
RE: A scientific reason to not believe?
(November 25, 2012 at 2:41 am)journeyinghowie Wrote:
(November 25, 2012 at 2:32 am)Stimbo Wrote: Null Hypothesis

There you go. Knock yourself out.

I learned nothing other than I already knew. Please, give me something useful. I feel like no one around here actually knows why they are atheist. It seems to me that its just a bunch of people with anti-religious sentiment talking about how much they hate religion for whatever reason. I don't see much real evidence for me to become an Atheist.

Sorry for joining in late... but how about:

Absolute no reliability in the NT documents.
1) not one author in the Bible claims to have met Jesus in person.
2) nothing can be known about an historical Jesus because the Gospels are hearsay upon hearsay.
3) the Bible has been edited and been added to substantially by anonymous people. The evidence is there in the different manuscripts found. Who knows what their motive was.

Stricking similarities between Christianity and older religions.
1) Mithraism portrayed Mithra as having a last supper.
2) virtually all the Catholic rituals were also in Mithraism, as the B grade apologist Justin Martyr tells us.

Also, because you are Catholic, you get the anti-Christian arguments+:

Your priests are perverted paedophiles who are protected by what is meant to be the body of people who propagate the Holy word of Gawd. Absolutely sickening.



I really wanted to get more of my reasons down but I'm meeting up with someone now so I have to go. Another one before I leave though: nowhere in the OT does it say the messiah will be born of a virgin. A young woman, yes, but NOT virgin.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply



Messages In This Thread
A scientific reason to not believe? - by journeyinghowie - November 25, 2012 at 2:30 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - November 25, 2012 at 2:32 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by journeyinghowie - November 25, 2012 at 2:41 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - November 25, 2012 at 3:41 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by The realest - December 3, 2012 at 6:01 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - December 5, 2012 at 7:34 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by FallentoReason - December 4, 2012 at 9:27 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Waratah - November 25, 2012 at 2:33 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by cratehorus - November 25, 2012 at 2:36 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Annik - November 25, 2012 at 2:37 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Annik - November 25, 2012 at 2:48 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by journeyinghowie - November 25, 2012 at 3:07 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Norfolk And Chance - November 25, 2012 at 12:33 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Mister Agenda - November 27, 2012 at 4:10 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Annik - November 25, 2012 at 3:10 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by journeyinghowie - November 25, 2012 at 3:17 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Gilgamesh - November 25, 2012 at 3:58 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by genkaus - November 26, 2012 at 2:45 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Ryantology - November 25, 2012 at 3:16 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Annik - November 25, 2012 at 3:19 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by cratehorus - November 25, 2012 at 3:43 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Creed of Heresy - November 25, 2012 at 4:16 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Voltron - November 25, 2012 at 4:16 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by KichigaiNeko - November 25, 2012 at 5:15 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by downbeatplumb - November 25, 2012 at 5:37 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by KichigaiNeko - November 25, 2012 at 7:58 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Welsh cake - November 25, 2012 at 5:36 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Zen Badger - November 25, 2012 at 7:09 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by pocaracas - November 25, 2012 at 11:21 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Angrboda - November 26, 2012 at 3:26 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by pocaracas - November 26, 2012 at 5:46 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Napoléon - November 25, 2012 at 2:47 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by The Grand Nudger - November 25, 2012 at 3:53 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cato - November 25, 2012 at 5:21 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by KichigaiNeko - November 27, 2012 at 2:15 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - November 27, 2012 at 4:03 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Kirbmarc - November 27, 2012 at 4:27 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Vincenzo Vinny G. - November 28, 2012 at 12:24 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Gilgamesh - November 28, 2012 at 12:27 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by overlord fombax - November 28, 2012 at 4:04 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cyberman - November 28, 2012 at 3:52 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Vincenzo Vinny G. - November 30, 2012 at 12:49 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cato - November 30, 2012 at 12:55 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by ThomM - December 1, 2012 at 9:09 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Darkstar - December 4, 2012 at 5:48 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Jackalope - December 3, 2012 at 1:36 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Voltron - December 3, 2012 at 1:45 am
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Cato - December 4, 2012 at 6:17 pm
RE: A scientific reason to not believe? - by Lion IRC - December 4, 2012 at 9:32 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 12263 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  It's Darwin Day tomorrow - logic and reason demands merriment! Duty 7 1039 February 13, 2022 at 10:21 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Why do you not believe in the concept of a God? johndoe122931 110 12392 June 19, 2021 at 12:21 pm
Last Post: Mermaid
  "Why is it reasonable to believe in prisons, but not in the hell?" FlatAssembler 124 12014 February 19, 2021 at 12:11 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  No reason justifies disbelief. Catharsis 468 60077 March 30, 2019 at 6:57 pm
Last Post: fredd bear
  Who do not atheists believe? Interaktive 12 3074 March 25, 2019 at 10:46 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Choosing to/not to Believe? Not Possible? JairCrawford 61 11899 July 1, 2018 at 11:16 pm
Last Post: EgoDeath
  What is your reason for being an atheist? dimitrios10 43 10684 June 6, 2018 at 10:47 am
Last Post: DodosAreDead
  Are there any scientific books or studies that explain what makes a person religious? WisdomOfTheTrees 13 3122 February 9, 2017 at 2:33 am
Last Post: Mirek-Polska
  Is atheism a scientific perspective? AAA 358 79035 January 27, 2017 at 7:49 pm
Last Post: brewer



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)