Macro and Micro evolution for dummies.

[John V]

The transition of one color to another is a man-made process?

In this case it is. Someone typed that stuff out and set the colors, you know.

Tell me, Calvin's dad, who invented it?

If you have a point, please make it. The strip mentions sunsets. In thinking about this earlier, I thought first of a rainbow, but that doesn't work, as all colors appear at once - there's no transition over time. I then thought of sunsets. I've never really watched a sunset to see if it fits. There would probably be a number of breakdowns in the analogy, but at least being man-made wouldn't be one of them, as in the case at hand.

---

There is no such distinction as "macro" and "micro" evolution as the cretinists would have their sheeplike followers believe.

It is the same thing viewed on different time scales.

You can define it that way. Some creationists go further, adding that macroevolution must involve addition of information, while microevolution is change resulting from loss of information. For example, a particular breed of dog is essentially a wolf with part of the genome extracted.

---

Because light is man-made and ordered?

Becasue that illustration is man-made and ordered, and is claimed to be analogous to evolution.

Do you guys realize how dumb you sound?

Have you looked in a mirror lately?

Just because you accept evolution doesn't mean you have to defend every argument made in favor of it. This one was lame. Deal with it.