Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 19, 2025, 9:03 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark
#36
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark
(December 21, 2012 at 5:14 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:
(December 19, 2012 at 8:52 am)Brian37 Wrote: I hate the title of the thread, to me this vernacular, "Compositional anaylsis".

It's jsut so theists can feel "special" and "intelligent" Brian.

Don't stress it. They know not what they do... erm to coin a phrase. Dodgy

And yes Min is right.

Theist don't know their own scripture because they are too busy being elitist. Big Grin

Well the feeling of "elitist" is a human psychology, not a label issue. Our species did evolve with a childish need to feel special, like when a baby smiles after getting the mother's nipple.

And I wouldn't say that theists don't know their scripture. I'd say that while many don't bother reading their holy books, the ones who do don't agree and the zealots and moderates and liberals who do know their scripture, cant understand that there was life before the invention of their myth, and the universe will continue long after our species goes extinct.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 22, 2012 at 10:14 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Cyberman - December 18, 2012 at 10:52 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 19, 2012 at 3:53 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 19, 2012 at 5:15 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 19, 2012 at 8:52 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by pocaracas - December 19, 2012 at 10:39 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 20, 2012 at 3:23 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 22, 2012 at 7:59 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 19, 2012 at 3:32 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 19, 2012 at 5:15 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 19, 2012 at 6:05 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 20, 2012 at 4:45 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 20, 2012 at 7:17 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 21, 2012 at 2:33 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Gospel of John controversy Jillybean 13 3078 June 12, 2024 at 10:54 pm
Last Post: Prycejosh1987
  Mark's Gospel was damaged and reassembled incorrectly SeniorCitizen 1 766 November 19, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Embellishments in the Gospel of Mark. Jehanne 133 23474 May 7, 2019 at 9:50 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  How can you prove that the gospel of Mark is not the "word of god"? Lincoln05 100 18842 October 16, 2018 at 5:38 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  The Gospel of Peter versus the Gospel of Matthew. Jehanne 47 9854 July 14, 2018 at 12:22 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  The Anonymous Gospel Manuscripts athrock 127 33443 February 9, 2016 at 1:46 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles = Satanic Gospel Metis 14 5451 July 17, 2015 at 12:16 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Why do gospel contradictions matter? taylor93112 87 25450 April 28, 2015 at 7:27 pm
Last Post: Desert Diva
  The infancy gospel of thomas dyresand 18 9068 December 29, 2014 at 10:35 am
Last Post: dyresand
  "Gospel Quest" (or The Jesus Timeline) DeistPaladin 93 23401 August 11, 2014 at 5:40 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)