(November 9, 2008 at 2:32 pm)Daystar Wrote:Well, you said there was evidence for witches & warlocks, and the "evidence" is that there are people that call themselves witches/warlocks. However, using those words and saying there is evidence for them *implies* you are talking about magic (ie: supernatural magic, not "sleight of hand" tricks).(November 9, 2008 at 10:54 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:(November 8, 2008 at 5:28 pm)Daystar Wrote: This is what pisses me off about people like you. Go back and read it again and see if you can do it without reading anything into it.
You said something stupid, you got smacked down for it ... what's the problem?
Kyu
Wrong again, Kyu. I said that there were witches and warlocks. There are. My cousin is a witch. I said that they, like magicians, can do things that you (any of you) can't explain. I said that that isn't an indication that Harry Potter is non-fiction.
Read it again, and see if you can shift your brainwashed monkey minds into "observation."
The fact your cousin calls herself a witch doesn't mean she can cast spells and if there are inexplicable things caused by what she does her viewpoint says "magic", my viewpoint says "not sure what happened, but it will be explained one day".
My lack of belief in anything supernatural me interpret things in my own way, just as your belief in god(s) makes you interpert them in your way (and your sister's wican(?) beliefs makes her interpret what happens in her's).
As far as I am aware, irrefutable evidence has not been found for any "magic", including things like "faith" healing.